57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
13
18
1
6
3
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#3
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
4.3
6.1
1.0
4.7
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
123
47
27
146
36
40

Nass

Nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich