56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Anzahl der Tests
4
16
9
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
5.5
5.8
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
92

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
66%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
70%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
88%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich