56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Anzahl der Tests
4
16
13
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
5.5
6.2
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
530

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich