57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
16
1
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
5.5
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
66

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich