58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
16
5
18
4
4
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
5.5
2.2
6.1
3.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
63
47
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.