57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
16
18
6
3
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
5.5
6.1
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
47
146
40

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich