57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
6
3
5
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
6.1
4.7
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
146
40
63

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich