57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
33
3
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
4.1
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
658
40

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
94%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Michelin Energy Saver +
55%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich