57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta PS71Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
1
15
3
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
1.0
9.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
40
64
225
34

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich