57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
3
18
1
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
1.3
6.1
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
40
23
47
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen