Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

4

3

14

15

3

Optimale Position

#3

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

3.6

9.0

3.7

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

111

40

188

225

34

Nass

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - längs

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - quer

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Handling - nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Seitenführung

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Kreisbahn nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen