Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

UltraGrip Performance+

Anzahl der Tests

4

3

14

23

Optimale Position

#3

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

3.6

3.3

Neuester Test

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

111

40

188

176

Nass

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - längs

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Nassbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - quer

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Handling - nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kreisbahn nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Seitenführung

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Trockenbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Handling - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Außengeräusch

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rollwiderstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen