57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
3
3
1
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#4
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
4.3
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
99
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen