57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
3
3
14
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#4
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
4.3
3.7
3.6
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
99
36
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen