57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
5
4
1
5
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
2.8
3.3
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
139
40
66
63

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich