Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

4

18

1

23

5

Optimale Position

#3

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

6.1

1.0

3.3

2.2

Neuester Test

2025

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

111

47

64

176

63

Nass

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - quer

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - längs

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Nassbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Handling - nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Kreisbahn nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trockenbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rollwiderstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen