57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
23
3
3
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
1.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
176
23
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen