57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
5
15
3
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.8
9.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
40
158
226
36

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich