57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
6
5
3
1
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
4.7
2.2
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
146
63
36
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen