57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
3
6
5
1
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.7
4.7
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
36
146
63
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen