57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
14
1
4
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.6
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
194
66
40

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich