57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Nokian WetProof gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk
Nokian
WetProof
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
14
18
13
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
11.9
5.6
6.1
4.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2023
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
165
47
47
123

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Nokian WetProof
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Gegenseitige Prüfungen

OrganisationJahreszeitJahrDimension
ADACADAC
Sommer
2023205/55 R16Ansehen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen