Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental SportContact 7

Premium

Michelin

e.Primacy

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

SportContact 7

Anzahl der Tests

4

21

3

15

Optimale Position

#3

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

11.9

3.3

1.2

Neuester Test

2025

2024

2026

Verfügbare Größen

111

164

40

122

Nass

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - quer

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Aquaplaning - längs

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Nassbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Handling - nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Seitenführung

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Kreisbahn nass

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Trockenbremsen

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Handling - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Außengeräusch

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Komfort

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Continental SportContact 7

70%

Kosten

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Rollwiderstand

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Kilometerstand

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental SportContact 7

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

SportContact 7

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen