57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
1
18
3
4
Optimale Position
#3
#7
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
7.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2023
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
87
47
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen