58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
18
4
1
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.3
6.1
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
23
47
40
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.