57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
2
18
4
3
1
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
1.5
6.1
12.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
54
47
111
36
66
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen