57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Agilis+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Michelin
Agilis+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
3
3
Optimale Position
#10
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
3.3
3.7
1.3
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
32
40
36
23

Nass

Nass
Michelin Agilis+
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Agilis+
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Agilis+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Michelin Agilis+
33%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Agilis+
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Agilis+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Agilis+
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Agilis+
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Agilis+
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Agilis+
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Agilis+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich