57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Michelin
Agilis CrossClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
2
18
4
1
5
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2022
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
37
47
40
66
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
82%
Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen