57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Linglong Grip Master 4S gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Linglong
Grip Master 4S
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
5
4
6
4
28
Optimale Position
#4
#3
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.6
12.0
4.7
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
85
111
146
40
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Linglong Grip Master 4S
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - nass
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Linglong Grip Master 4S
49%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Nassbremsen
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Schnee
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%
Kosten
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Linglong Grip Master 4S
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Linglong Grip Master 4S
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Linglong Grip Master 4S
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Linglong Grip Master 4S
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Trocken
Linglong Grip Master 4S
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
Linglong Grip Master 4S
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
Linglong Grip Master 4S
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen