57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Linglong Grip Master 4S gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Linglong
Grip Master 4S
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
18
14
5
4
Optimale Position
#4
#1
#8
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.6
6.1
13.4
2.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
85
47
153
139
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Linglong Grip Master 4S
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Linglong Grip Master 4S
49%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kreisbahn nass
Linglong Grip Master 4S
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Schnee
Linglong Grip Master 4S
56%
Kosten
Linglong Grip Master 4S
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Linglong Grip Master 4S
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Linglong Grip Master 4S
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Linglong Grip Master 4S
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Linglong Grip Master 4S
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Linglong Grip Master 4S
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Linglong Grip Master 4S
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Linglong Grip Master 4S
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Linglong Grip Master 4S
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen