57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Linglong ComfortMaster gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Linglong
ComfortMaster
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
1
18
3
Optimale Position
#8
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
8.0
12.0
3.3
1.0
6.1
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
94
111
40
66
47
36

Nass

Nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich