56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Linglong ComfortMaster gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Linglong
ComfortMaster
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
10
Optimale Position
#8
#8
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
8.0
13.4
6.0
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
94
153
104

Nass

Nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - längs
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Nassbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Handling - nass
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Komfort
Linglong ComfortMaster
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Außengeräusch
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Trockenbremsen
Linglong ComfortMaster
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Handling - trocken
Linglong ComfortMaster
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rollwiderstand
Linglong ComfortMaster
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich