57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Laufenn S Fit EQ gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Laufenn
S Fit EQ
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
6
4
18
4
5
4
Optimale Position
#7
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
17.5
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2022
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
40
158
40

Nass

Nass
Laufenn S Fit EQ
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Laufenn S Fit EQ
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Handling - nass
Laufenn S Fit EQ
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Nassbremsen
Laufenn S Fit EQ
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Laufenn S Fit EQ
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Laufenn S Fit EQ
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Laufenn S Fit EQ
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Laufenn S Fit EQ
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Laufenn S Fit EQ
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Laufenn S Fit EQ
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Laufenn S Fit EQ
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Laufenn S Fit EQ
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Laufenn S Fit EQ
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Laufenn S Fit EQ
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Laufenn S Fit EQ
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Laufenn S Fit EQ
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich