57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
10
3
14
5
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.2
3.7
3.6
2.2
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
207
36
194
63

Nass

Nass
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Schnee

Schnee
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Schneetraktion
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Schnee Handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Schnee Slalom
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Traktion Kies
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Traktion Schlamm
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Traktion Sand
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
80%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich