57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Kumho HA32 Solus 4SObere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

HA32 Solus 4S

4.9
R13 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Michelin CrossClimate 2Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2

9.1
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
9
18
3
4
24
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.8
6.1
3.7
3.3
2.7
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
73
47
36
40
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Nassbremsen
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Handling - nass
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Schnee
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Schnee Slalom
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
58%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Schnee Handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Komfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Kosten
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Preis-Wert
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Kilometerstand
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trocken
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Handling - trocken
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -WinterreifenBeste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Auch vergleichen

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs Falken EuroALL Season AS210Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs Firestone Multiseason 2Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs Dunlop All Season 2Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs Nokian Seasonproof 2Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen