57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
10
4
6
4
5
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
12.0
4.7
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
111
146
40
63

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich