57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
1
4
4
6
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
1.0
12.0
3.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
27
111
40
146

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich