57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
1
14
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#8
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
1.0
13.4
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
66
153
40

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich