57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Anzahl der Tests
10
23
4
3
24
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
2.7
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
176
40
36
302

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen