57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
10
23
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
176
40
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Tread pattern comparison

Kumho Ecsta HS52
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen