57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
23
14
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
3.3
3.6
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
176
194
40

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich