57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
10
24
4
14
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
2.7
3.3
3.6
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
302
40
194

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen