57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Anzahl der Tests
10
16
4
4
33
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
5.5
12.0
3.3
4.1
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
153
111
40
658

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Nassfahrverhalten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
89%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich