56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
10
16
3
3
1
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
5.5
3.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
104
153
34
40
64

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich