57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
10
18
4
3
4
5
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
6.1
12.0
3.7
3.3
4.8
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
47
111
36
40
158

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen