57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
10
21
4
4
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#2
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
11.9
3.3
12.0
3.3
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
165
40
111
40
36
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen