56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
21
18
14
3
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#8
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
11.9
6.1
13.4
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
104
164
47
153
40

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Nassleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich