57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Anzahl der Tests
10
49
4
23
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
3.2
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
109
213
40
176
Nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Trockenleistung
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Kosten
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen