57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GT RADIAL ClimateActive gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
4
28
3
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
7.3
6.1
3.3
2.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
59
47
40
68
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Schnee
Vertrauensniveau
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preis-Wert
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen