Vergleich: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Winter

Premium

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Winter

Anzahl der Tests

23

3

2

Optimale Position

#1

#4

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

4.3

3.7

1.5

Neuester Test

2025

Verfügbare Größen

176

97

34

65

Trocken

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Schnee

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bremsen auf Schnee

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Schnee Handling

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Schneetraktion

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Schnee Slalom

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Nass

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Handling - nass

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Kosten

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Preis-Wert

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Komfort

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Komfort

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Eis

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Winter

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

e.Ziex

Winter

Testprofil

Trocken

Schnee

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Eis

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen